I read this article in Washington Post about Michelle Obama identifying her primary role as the mom-in-chief. What amazes me is that people have actually been surprised about her comment here. I am very much not surprised. In fact, I would have been more surprised if she would have said something different.
I have been to the US several times and every time I go there I meet these ugly subconscious preconceptions that the woman’s place is in the kitchen and no where else. The hidden comments. The hidden implications. The hints. The on the surface harmless jokes.
I will let a quote from the article speak for itself: “And yet, Barack Obama could have been describing so many women today when he explained that, for Michelle, “two visions of herself were at war with each other — the desire to be the woman her mother had been, solid, dependable, making a home and always there for her kids; and the desire to excel in her profession, to make her mark on the world and realize all those plans she’d had on the very first day that we met.”
This is where the identification comes in. The brutal reality is that, like our president-elect, most men do not wrestle quite so strenuously with these competing desires. So when the needs of our families collide with the demands of our jobs, it is usually the woman’s career that yields.”
I think it is sad. Really sad.
We should have come further in this world. I understand why the US is still here. A country built by very religious people who all had (and have) very strong beliefs that the traditional family structure is the right or the very least the optimal. I call men with that kind of idea, men with small dicks. :-)
Nevertheless, it is just sad.